Flipped
teaching has both pros and cons. Some of
the pros are that it allows the teacher more time to interact with students, as
opposed to just lecturing all period.
Students also have opportunities to ask questions and get help working
through problems while the teacher is present. A student’s parents may not be
willing or able to help them with homework, but the teacher being present gives
them a better chance of completing it and learning in the process. Also, students get to hear other classmates’
questions and concerns about the material and may feel more comfortable asking
questions if they know others are struggling with the same issues.
Some
cons are that not all students may be interested or responsible enough to complete
the assigned material outside of class.
Some students may ‘check out’ once they leave the classroom and
therefore not complete the assignment on their own time. If the teacher is not present to monitor them
or encourage them to participate, they may not do the work. If several of the students do not complete
out-of-class activities, it will slow down learning for everyone else, because
they will not be on track and ready to participate at the start of the class
period.
I
believe flipped teaching enhances student learning, but that not every student
is going to benefit from it 100% of the time.
Since students learn in different ways and at different paces, there
will be students who jump ahead and get bored where other students are struggle
and become frustrated. Even if all
students complete the assigned material, they may not all be on the same track when they return to class. For
example, one student may interpret what they read differently or may not
understand something that all other students understood. The teacher will need to closely monitor all
students’ progress and offer additional help when needed.
Flipped
teaching can definitely create a global learning environment in that it
presents opportunities for students to interact with each other and with other
students around the world. For example,
they can watch videos made by someone in a different country and interact with students
they would never otherwise meet. The
teacher may have his/her own website and the students could post questions and
talk back and forth with each other.
I
hope to one day teach English/language arts at the middle school or high school
level. That being said, I could use
flipped teaching in my classroom by having students read outside of class and
then engage in interactive activities in the classroom, such as role playing or
group discussion. For example, they
could read Romeo and Juliet at home and come to class ready to discuss what
they read and possibly act out the different scenes, as opposed to sitting and
reading in silence all class period.
I
think flipped teaching can be very beneficial, but that it is an ongoing
learning process. A lot of it boils down
to students’ desire to participate and take charge of their own learning. It places a great deal of responsibility in
the students’ hands. If students see a
benefit, they will be more likely to want to participate and be excited about
it.
I love your idea of using the flipped classroom in an English classroom. In a secondary room, it would be a great way to teach responsibility and allow the students a chance to get assistance from the teacher.
ReplyDeleteGreat Post!
I agree that flipped teaching does not always enhance student learning. You are correct in saying that not all students would be on the same track when they return to class. I could easily see some students interpreting lesson material one way and others interpreting it a different way. This could lead to a lot of confusion and possibly arguing the next day in class.
ReplyDeleteThis might be the biggest advantage: Some of the pros are that it allows the teacher more time to interact with students, as opposed to just lecturing all period.
ReplyDeleteInteraction is a critical piece.